Showing posts with label Tom Brady. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Tom Brady. Show all posts

Tuesday, January 27, 2015

Is Race Playing Factor in Who People Are Rooting for in Super Bowl?



I believe this is going to be the most controversial thing I’ve ever written on sports, and it might not even be close, and that’s probably saying something. And, I want to preface it by saying that this is just a theory I have. I do not have stone cold hard facts to back it up. I don’t have evidence to support it. It’s just my opinion of what I’m seeing.

The Super Bowl between the New England Patriots and the defending champion Seattle Seahawks is just a few days away and I’ve been asking people all week who they want to win the big game – not who they think will win – but who they want to win. The majority of these people have been saying the Patriots and have followed it up with reasons why they don’t like the Seahawks and those reasons always start with Richard Sherman, whom they never seem to mention by his full name, to these fans he’s just “Sherman” like some nefarious Marvel villain. 

The fact that these people are overwhelmingly rooting for the Patriots is interesting to me, because for the last decade-plus the Patriots have largely been the most hated team in the NFL, and one I’ve had to defend multiple times. Part of the reason the Patriots have seemingly been the most hated team in the NFL is they have this aura of cheating that surrounds them, and that has reared its ugly head recently with “Deflate-gate.” I’ve found that the Pats aren’t necessarily a team many of these people rooting for them to win the Super Bowl are wanting to root for – many have said they’re merely rooting for the lesser of two evils. That makes me wonder how a team that has multiple times been accused of cheating and people have largely despised for running roughshod over the AFC for more than a decade is the “lesser of two evils” over a Seahawks team, that I personally find the most enjoyable team in the NFL to watch and the only knock you could possibly find against them is they are the defending champs and some people don’t like to see the same team win in multiple seasons, for whatever reason that might be. 

They bring up Sherman, but is his brashness really any different than the arrogance exhibited by Patriots star tight end Rob Gronkowski or really the Pats team overall? You’d have to ask yourself if black brashness (or arrogance if you’d prefer) is viewed differently than white brashness and I think it is. 

It then occurred to me why some of these people might be rooting for the Pats over the Seahawks. The Patriots biggest stars are Tom Brady, Rob Gronkowski and arguably Julian Edelman. The Seahawks biggest stars are Richard Sherman, Russell Wilson and Marshawn Lynch. The Patriots are a largely white football team. I don’t know what percentage of the team is white, and frankly it doesn’t really matter, but they seem like the whitest team in the league. Whereas the Seahawks, you could argue, seem like the blackest team in the league. Can you even name one white star on the team?

Again, this doesn’t really matter or at least it shouldn’t, but I think it’s why a lot of people are rooting for the Patriots to beat the Seahawks in the Super Bowl. Now, I’m not accusing these people of racism. No, I don’t believe they are racist at all. In fact, I believe that they don’t even realize this is playing a factor in their decision of which team to root for. I believe subconsciously they are choosing to root for the guys that look like them, without really thinking about it. We’ve seen recently in this country that there are racial issues, whether we want to believe it or not they exist, and frequently people will agree with or go with those who look like they do or believe the way they do.  

It’s controversial I know. Most people are likely going to think it asinine, I know. But, I think race is playing a certain role in who people are choosing to root for in this year’s Super Bowl. How else can you explain why so many are hoping America’s most hated team beats the Seahawks on Sunday?

Monday, August 9, 2010

Greatest Numbers in Sports

There are a lot of uncertainties in the world of sports, but one certainty is that sports are all about numbers. If somebody came up and asked me how many career home runs Hank Aaron hit I’d instantly say 755. If they came up and asked me how many career race wins Richard Petty had I’d instantly say 200. Numbers are simply engrained into sports.

ESPN recently had a SportsNation poll of the greatest single-game or single-season numbers in sports history.

Here is a list of those numbers in chronological order from oldest to most recent:

.406- Ted Williams’ batting average (last player to bat .400 in a season), 1941
56- Joe DiMaggio’s hit streak, 1941
61- Roger Maris’ home runs, 1961
31-13-11- Oscar Robertson’s points/rebound/assist average, 1961-62
100- Wilt Chamberlain’s single-game point total, 1962
1.12- Bob Gibson’s ERA, 1968
92- Wayne Gretzky’s single-season goals record, 1981-82
2,105- Eric Dickerson’s single-season rushing record, 1984
5,084- Dan Marino’s single-season passing record, 1984
73- Barry Bonds’ single-season home run record, 2001
31- LaDanian Tomlinson’s single-season rushing touchdowns record, 2006
296- Adrian Peterson’s single-game rushing record, 2007
50- Tom Brady’s single-season passing touchdowns record, 2007
9.58- Usain Bolt’s record time in the 100 meters, 2009
59- Lowest round score on PGA Tour; occurred five times; most recently by Paul Goydos & Stuart Appleby, 2009

SportsNation fans listed these numbers as the top 5:

1. .406- Ted Williams
2. 100- Wilt Chamberlain
3. 56- Joe DiMaggio
4. 1.12- Bob Gibson
5. 9.58- Usain Bolt

My Top 5:

1. 100- Wilt Chamberlain … I don’t think anybody will ever do this again.
2. .406- Ted Williams … I also don’t think anybody will ever do this again.
3. 1.12- Bob Gibson … Once again, I don’t think anybody will ever do this again.
4. 56- Joe DiMaggio … Certainly possible, but the closest anybody has ever gotten was within 12 games.
5. 61- Roger Maris … 61 single-season home runs is still the record in my mind … Bonds’ 73 means absolutely nothing.

There are six numbers that I would like to see added to the list though:

130- Rickey Henderson’s single-season stolen base record, 1982
20- Record for strikeouts in a game; held by Roger Clemens (twice) & Kerry Wood (1998)
15- Number of strokes Tiger Woods beat the field by in the 2000 U.S. Open
14- Number of laps Ned Jarrett won a NASCAR race by at Charlotte, 1965
12- Most RBIs in a single-game held by Jim Bottomley (1924) & Mark Whiten (1992)
7- Most sacks in a single-game by Derrick Thomas, 1990

What do you think is the greatest number in sports?

Tuesday, July 20, 2010

$50 Million Dollar Baby

Overall number one NFL draft pick Sam Bradford from the Oklahoma Sooners is reportedly going to be the highest paid player in football without ever even playing a down in the league.

The St. Louis Rams are probably going to have to give Bradford a deal in the neighborhood of $50 million, according to ESPN’s Adam Schefter. It’s a sign that rookie contracts are continuing to rise in the NFL. Detroit Lions quarterback Matthew Stafford who was taken as the first overall draft pick last year was given a contract worth $41.5 million.

It is utterly ridiculous to think that Bradford could make more money than Super Bowl winning quarterbacks like Tom Brady, Peyton Manning, Brett Favre and Drew Brees.

It’s dangerous for teams like the Rams to basically be forced into signing these outrageous contracts by agents and players when overall number one picks can prove to be busts. Bradford could easily become a great quarterback like Peyton Manning or Troy Aikman, but he could just as easily become a bust like JaMarcus Russell, David Carr and Tim Couch.

It’s also dangerous for the Rams to give Bradford so much money because he’s already proven to be injury prone. Bradford was seriously injured in his final year at college with the Sooners and forced to miss the majority of the season. He’ll surely be knocked around like a rag doll in the NFL, especially with the Rams only having the 24th projected offensive line in the league, according to football.about.com.

It would seem that the only real way for the NFL to avoid the rising rookie salaries would be to go to a rookie scale salary like the NBA does. In the NBA the draft picks have there own assigned salaries that ensures that the first overall pick makes more than the second pick and the second pick makes more than the third and so on. The contracts are each for two years with team options for a third and fourth.

The NBA has it 100 percent right when it comes to rookie contracts. The NFL desperately needs to go that route to ensure that unproven players like Bradford aren’t the richest athletes in the sport.