It's Time to Stop Villainizing Baseball Players Without Real Proof

Last night I was enjoying some of the best sluggers in the game of baseball like two-time champ Yoenis Cespedes, Giancarlo Stanton and Jose Bautista competing in the Home Run Derby and following along with what experts were saying about the derby on Twitter.

Shortly after Toronto Blue Jays slugger Jose Bautista put on quite the show by hitting 10 homers in the first round I saw a tweet from ESPN’s Max Kellerman more than insinuating that Bautista was or had been at one time a performance enhancing drug user. This isn’t an opinion that’s rare; back when Bautista went from unknown to 50-plus homer guy in 2010 it was an opinion that was quite prevalent among people, just as it was last year when Chris Davis of the Baltimore Orioles also went from relatively unknown to a 50-plus homer guy.

Kellerman seemed so certain that Bautista was a PEDs user because he went from a 15 homer a year guy at age 25-28 to 54 homers at age 29 and 43 homers at age 30, when Kellerman was certain his numbers should’ve been on the decline instead of a sharp and dramatic rise.

Kellerman’s flat out accusation of Bautista as a cheater irritated me because the slugger has never failed a drug test. I will also add that Bautista looks the exact same now as he did when he was a 15 homer a year player for the Pittsburgh Pirates, whereas Bonds, McGwire and Sosa all got noticeably bigger. But, I’m not sure how high and mighty I can really get on the topic, because I can understand the skepticism of a player going from 15 homers a year to 50-plus, because I was somewhat skeptical of Chris Davis last season.

A home run jump of nearly 40 home runs in a season’s span seems like something that should be accusatory because it seems so unlikely and borderline impossible, but then again we have seen players before who hit late maturity growths or made minute changes in their swing that resulted in becoming almost completely different players. The problem is it’s hard to determine these changes from performance enhancing drug induced changes and they also seem a little less likely to result in such mass differences.

Still, the accusations of Kellerman rubbed me the wrong way and I can’t help but thinking that players like Bautista and Davis deserve to be treated fairly and innocent until proven guilty. Bautista and Davis have never failed steroid tests, so why should we treat them as cheats? 

Maybe it’s because we’ve been made so skeptical of home run inflations by proven cheaters like Barry Bonds, Mark McGwire and Sammy Sosa who saw home run numbers fly to astronomical rates with the help of steroids that we just can’t trust the game and it’s most glamorous play anymore.

I understand why someone would look at Jose Bautista’s career and scratch and shake their head. I really do. But, I think it’s time to stop publicly slandering or defaming someone who’s never been attached to cheating before … especially when we’ve allowed players who have been connected with performance enhancing drugs and are cheaters, like Nelson Cruz, to start right beside them in the All Star Game.